NCAA News Archive - 2006

« back to 2006 | Back to NCAA News Archive Index

Ice hockey panel charts progress with hitting from behind


Jul 3, 2006 1:01:25 AM

By Ty Halpin
The NCAA News

The NCAA Men’s and Women’s Ice Hockey Rules Committee reinforced its commitment to eliminating hitting from behind and mapped out a strategic plan for future changes at its annual meeting June 5-8 in San Antonio.

The committee also dealt with goals directed into the net by an attacking player’s skate, offered further protections to the goalkeeper with the crease rule and recommended that conferences check goalkeeper equipment for legality during the season.

The Playing Rules Oversight Panel will consider the proposals on a conference call for final approval.

Committee members discussed hitting from behind at length. The topic also had been vetted at the coaches meetings in April. The committee reviewed several proposals to create an intermediate penalty that might better enforce the infraction. The committee ultimately decided to stay with the current rule, which calls for a major penalty and game misconduct or disqualification when this infraction occurs into the boards or goal cage.

"Ultimately, this rule has started to achieve the intended result and changed player behavior," said Rico Blasi, chair of the committee and head coach at Miami University (Ohio). "A lesser penalty sends a mixed message to officials and undermines much of the progress we have made in this area."

The only major change the committee made dealt with icing. Starting this season, when the attacking team attempts a pass that is deemed receivable by the official, icing will be nullified. The change, implemented successfully in the National Hockey League this season, allows play to continue and encourages additional offensive opportunities.

The committee also confirmed two clarifications it made during the season. The first indicates that goalkeepers are protected in the goal-crease area. The new wording applies to attacking players who are in the goal crease and impeding the goalkeeper from playing the position (visually, physically or otherwise). The committee also noted that officials may stop play if the goalkeeper is being impeded and conduct a faceoff outside the zone.

"The crease is the goalkeeper’s area," said Blasi. "The rule change made last year achieved the intended result, but we want to be sure we maintain the protection of the goalkeeper."

The second clarification deals with goals scored when the puck is directed into the net off an attacking player’s skate. The committee viewed several examples and confirmed its stance that those goals are allowed.

"The hockey community has made it clear that goals scored in this way should be viewed as a skill play," Blasi said. "The committee agrees with that position."

The committee did clarify, though, that the puck must be propelled first by the stick (for example, shot or pass) for the goal to count.

In other actions, the committee set a future agenda for the college game that included consideration of the following proposals that could be implemented by the 2008-09 season:

  • Eliminating ties (the committee will solicit ideas for a procedure).
  • Establishing one officiating system for all levels of college hockey (the committee has added the two-referee, two-linesman system to the rules book to increase the options available for experimentation and discussion).
  • Eliminating hand passes altogether or allowing them in all areas of the ice to establish consistency.
  • Possibly eliminating one-piece composite sticks (the committee notes that they break frequently and create potentially dangerous situations on the ice).
  • Gathering more injury data on half shields for comparison and discussion.

The committee also voted to use a two-year process for rules changes, meaning the next rules book will span the 2006-07 and 2007-08 seasons.

The committee also nominated Jim Knowlton of the U.S. Military Academy as its new chair beginning in September.

Other highlights

Men’s and Women’s Ice Hockey Rules Committee

June 5-8/San Antonio

In addition to the changes noted in the accompanying article, the committee made the following rules changes:

  • Voted to allow 21 skaters and as many as three goalkeepers for exhibition games.
  • Added goalkeeper’s equipment specifications to the rules book and recommended a compliance check at least once during the season by each conference. The committee plans to work in conjunction with the championships committees to check equipment before NCAA championship competition.
  • Altered the face-mask rule to allow a minor penalty or major at the referee’s discretion. Previously, the penalty was an automatic major.
  • Agreed that by mutual consent of the competing teams, the game protocol may be altered for special presentations (for example, senior night, jersey retirement, anniversary celebrations).
  • Approved the following experimental rules for use during exhibition games or in conference-only play:
  • When a team is shorthanded, that team is not allowed to ice the puck.
  • When icing is called, the team that iced the puck is not allowed to substitute.
  •  Agreed on the following as points of emphasis for the upcoming season:
  • Hitting from behind. As the committee’s focus on obstruction fouls changed player behavior a few years ago, dangerous hits from behind lessened considerably with last year’s focus on these penalties. At the end of the season, players had more respect for their opponents in this area and had altered the means of contact as a direct result of the committee’s focus. Reckless checking from behind will not be allowed and the impetus remains on the player delivering the hit.
  • Goal crease. Last year’s alteration to allow attacking players in the goal crease when a goal is scored was not intended to allow interference with the goalkeeper. The goalkeeper must be allowed to play the position. Therefore, attacking players are not allowed to enter the goal crease and disrupt the goalkeeper from playing the position. Officials have the option of stopping play and conducting a neutral zone faceoff or calling an interference penalty.
  • Embellishment. The committee is concerned with what seems to be an increase in players using deceptive tactics to draw penalties. While the focus on obstruction and hitting from behind may have contributed, embellishment must be penalized. When players gain an advantage and draw a penalty, they must trust officials to make the call and not embellish the penalty.

 


© 2010 The National Collegiate Athletic Association
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy