NCAA News Archive - 2000

« back to 2000 | Back to NCAA News Archive Index


International intrigue
Men's volleyball coaches divided on foreign players' fit in collegiate game


Feb 14, 2000 10:09:47 AM

BY KERI POTTS
The NCAA News

In recent years, NCAA men's volleyball has had to survive growing pressures related to Title IX compliance and continually shrinking athletics department budgets.

But some volleyball experts say a new concern is threatening a sport with already low participation numbers.

Many coaches are worried that the growing number of international players on college rosters may have unintended long-term consequences for the continued health of the sport. They believe those players are taking opportunities away from American players and in turn compromising the sport at its highest level.

One of those coaches is Greg Giovinazzi, former U.S. Women's National Team assistant and former head coach at the University of Michigan. In an editorial in Volleyball magazine in 1998, Giovinazzi called for a return to recruiting home-grown players in the men's collegiate game, saying, "There are barely enough teams for (men's volleyball) to keep its varsity status. Yet, more and more, we are kicking our own sport when it's down by replacing American players with foreign athletes."

There currently are 23 Division I teams, 18 Division II teams and 40 Division III programs. With only 4.5 scholarships allowed per team of 12 or more at the Division I and II levels, opportunities to play collegiately, on scholarship, are severely limited for America's male junior players. With international players joining teams and using some of these scholarships, opportunities are further reduced. Opponents of this trend say the cost is not merely that of a scholarship but quite possibly the future of the sport.

Feeder system

NCAA men's volleyball is a nonrevenue sport at almost every sponsoring institution. The players do not have lucrative professional opportunities awaiting them in the U.S. Only a handful go on to the national team; some play abroad or on the beach circuit. Primarily, college volleyball is the "feeder system" for the U.S. national teams.

Tom Pingel, director of junior development and high performance camps at USA Volleyball, said, "We're relying on college teams to prepare our national team players."

It is an expectation that college coaches at the top programs know and understand. Their concern, therefore, is this: When international players replace American players at the nation's top men's volleyball programs, for junior players, it is opportunity lost. If they can't hone their skills in college, the next generation of national team players could be jeopardized.

A poor showing by the national team at important settings such as the Olympics leads to decreased exposure and interest in the sport. Fewer juniors will play. The men's college game will diminish, as will the national team.

"The message we are sending to junior players is that international players will get the scholarships they want," Pingel said. Even though there has been growth in the number of male juniors programs, he said, until there is a real surge in participation, it is a tenuous situation at best.

Quick fix for winning

Pointing to the success of the 1980s men's national team, which brought home two consecutive Olympic gold medals, Giovinazzi said, "The talent is here. Instead of going for the quick fix, we should be working to develop American players."

Giovinazzi said he is referring to programs that lose the nation's top recruits on a yearly basis to perennial powerhouses like Stanford University, the University of California, Los Angeles, and Pepperdine University, which are looking to get a piece of the national championship pie. Recruiting foreign athletes gives them immediate results.

As a former international professional player, Giovinazzi said he knows first-hand the value of playing in a foreign country. But he still proposes a limit on the number of foreign athletes allowed per team and a ban on international recruiting trips altogether.

"I do believe having foreign players adds a great number of things to a team. But I'm opposed to letting that number get too high," he said. "Every other country limits it to two; the U.S. should be no different."

Not everyone agrees. Some college coaches believe a limit on bringing in foreign talent would virtually cripple their potential to win a national championship or build strong teams.

"Personally, I don't like the influx of international players. I know what it does to the national team program. But I'm trying to keep my job," said Arnie Ball, men's coach at Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne.

For a school located in the middle of the country, attracting top players to Indiana and keeping top players from leaving is an annual struggle. "When we show up with 4.5 scholarships and UCLA shows up with 4.5 scholarships, where do you think those kids are going to want to play?" Ball asked.

Indiana/Purdue-Fort Wayne competes regionally with Ohio State University and Ball State University for Midwest players, while Pennsylvania State University has a stronghold on the East. "All of us coaches have one thing in mind -- to win a national championship," Ball said. "To do that, I've got to find players somewhere."

Surprisingly, for a place many consider paradise, the recruiting crunch also affects the men's program at the University of Hawaii, Manoa. Coach Mike Wilton said because of his school's location, he has difficulties in monitoring talent on the mainland.

"The good players in Hawaii usually want to go to the mainland to get a taste of something different," Wilton said. "Our access to the mainland talent is limited."

Most of the mainland talent is found on the West Coast, which is prime recruiting territory for the California schools.

"As we look at players each year, we don't have preconceived notions as to where we'll look," Wilton said. "I recruit people who can help us. If it is an American prospect that looks better and wants to come here, we'll take him, and if it's an international player that looks better, then he's our man."

In 1996, Hawaii's Yuval Katz (from Israel) was the American Volleyball Coaches Association Co-National Player of the Year and the Most Outstanding Player of the National Collegiate Men's Volleyball Championship. The Rainbows lost in the finals that year, but the key point is that they made it to the finals -- where every coach wants to be at the end of the season.

Diverse benefits

Wilton currently boasts four international players on a roster of 14 -- the most he's ever had. Instead of looking ahead to the impact of international players on the American volleyball scene, his point of reference narrows to the here and now.

"At Hawaii, we have a unique situation," he said. "We have to be good."

The pressure to win comes from a home crowd that packs the Stan Sheriff Center regularly for home matches. Last year, the men's team brought in $1.86 million after budget expenses were withdrawn.

For Wilton, recruiting international players presents new opportunities for American players. He said foreign players culturally enrich the overall college experience for everyone involved. "They add to the rainbow effect," he said.

Ball has had his share of foreign players, but said the cultural blending that takes place is more of an after-effect than a forethought. "It's not the reason I solicit foreign players," he said.

The most favorable reason for coaches to recruit foreign players is because they bring solid experience to the court. Foreign players start playing younger and at a higher level of training. In their later years, they are not restricted to NCAA practice limit rules.

When they do come to the U.S. to play college volleyball, they already have years of experience at the junior national and national team levels in their respective countries.

For these coaches, using foreign players is what Penn State head coach Mark Pavlik calls "a double-edged sword." They are being asked to choose between the future of the national program and the sport as a whole and establishing winning programs that attract national attention for their respective schools.

Pavlik said having international players doesn't mean American players on the team are at a disadvantage. Regardless of a player's nationality, "when you have a great player, it makes the other players around him better," said Pavlik.

In his experiences with foreign players, Ball said he has been pleased with their high level of play and the character they bring to the team.

"From a strictly selfish standpoint, in addition to their academic prowess, they're also very disciplined," he said.

His current roster has two players from Cyprus who have served two years in their country's military.

For Pavlik, the foreign influx in volleyball is an everyday function of university life. "Volleyball is just another program the university offers; just like chemistry or engineering," he said. "As long as they accept international students, we take them. That's how I'm going to recruit."

Not every international player is on scholarship. Panos Eracleous of Cyprus recently joined his brother, Aris, at Indiana/Purdue-Fort Wayne. He receives no funding from the team's budget. "Sometimes we get these players who don't want money and just want to come here on their own to play," Ball said. "Not a day goes by that I don't receive an inquiry from somewhere in the world about playing here."

"The problems college volleyball is having has nothing to do with the use of international players," Pavlik said. "It is a symptom of a greater problem occurring on the juniors level."

He points to grass-roots efforts for men's volleyball that lack the support often found in sports such as soccer and basketball.

Ball said parents are more likely to pump resources into developing a daughter for volleyball than they would a son. The result is growth for the women's game and a stall in the growth of the men's game.

Before the situation gets better -- that is, prime talent available in volume here in the U.S. -- Ball offered this sobering assessment: "I think it has every opportunity to get worse."

Long-term relief may come from possible changes in NCAA amateurism rules, which currently are under review in Divisions I and II. The proposals are designed to allow, under certain circumstances, pre-enrolled student-athletes to receive prize money or compensation from organized competition. In return, there would be a loss of one year of eligibility for every year of organized competition in which a pre-enrolled student participated. Action on that legislation, however, appears to be one or two years away.

Until then, coaches like Pavlik think the best way to bridge the problem is to grow the sport.

"We need colleges to step up, to sponsor more men's teams," Pavlik said. "To put the responsibility on only a handful of teams for the growth of the sport is unfair."


© 2010 The National Collegiate Athletic Association