« back to 2006 | Back to NCAA News Archive Index
|
In an attempt to deal with numerous false starts and unfair starts in the offensive position, the committee altered and clarified the sequence a referee must follow when restarting a match in that position.
“With this rule clarification, we hope it will make it easier for referees and student-athletes to have a fair restart and help reduce the number of false starts and ‘rolling starts,’ ” said committee Chair William Walker, deputy athletics director at the U.S. Air Force Academy.
The procedure, which is covered in Rule 2-1-b and c, reads:
“The time sequence of assuming the offensive position is to: (1) set the knee(s) and feet; (2) place the palm of one hand on the navel; (3) place the other palm on or over the near elbow; and (4) the referee may pause momentarily before starting wrestling.”
The committee also voted to standardize language dealing with supporting points and the out of bounds line. Under the proposed change, takedowns, escapes and reversals will be consistent, making any part of the supporting point the determining factor.
“This is a rule that really has worked very well in takedowns,”
Under the previous rule, determination of escapes and reversals depended upon the foot of either wrestler being in bounds. Now, if a hand, knee or other supporting point(s) is in bounds, the points will be awarded.
The committee proposed another clarification in the takedown rule as well. When competition approaches the out of bounds line and a takedown is in progress, but both wrestlers leave the mat and are in the air, points will be granted, providing a supporting point ends up in bounds and a foot of either wrestler remained in the wrestling area at all times.
“That certainly is a rare situation, but it is one that occurred this year and caused discussion among officials and coaches,”
Committee members also reviewed the NCAA’s Weight Management Program, which the committee administers in conjunction with the National Wrestling Coaches Association. Members noted that some institutions were fined for violations of the program but that only one of the violations was considered to be dangerous to the student-athlete. All violations included a monetary fine.
“In general, the program is accomplishing the goal of assisting our institutions in determining the safest and most appropriate weight for student-athletes,”
The committee took action on several weight-related items, forwarding the proposals to the Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sport. Those measures include:
The Wrestling Rules Committee also recommended the following changes:
© 2010 The National Collegiate Athletic Association
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy