NCAA News Archive - 2002

« back to 2002 | Back to NCAA News Archive Index

Continuing Education
The Will to Act Project


Sep 16, 2002 9:20:04 AM


The NCAA News

A group of college presidents recently estimated that they and their colleagues spend approximately 2 percent of their time on average on anything having to do with intercollegiate athletics. But consider these facts:

The governance restructuring that took place in 1997 was designed to emphasize presidential involvement and control of college sports.

Campus athletics programs may be the only contact a college or university has with some of its constituents.

In normal times, athletics programs can be a significant public relations and gift-giving boon for a university.

In times of crisis, athletics programs may become the bane of a college president's life.

A nearly undeniable fact is that college sports typically draw a disproportionate amount of attention to a campus compared to the small amount of attention college sports receives from the chief executive officer. Unfortunately, intercollegiate athletics often is buried among many other high-profile issues until, without warning, a crisis arises in the athletics department. Suddenly the crisis requires the immediate attention of what may be an uninformed, inexperienced and previously uninvolved CEO.

The bottom line is that college sports is a $4 billion enterprise that no longer can operate in the background for college presidents.

A clear and present need exists for a new "continuing education" program for college presidents. The purpose of such a program is to challenge presidents to rethink the context and role of intercollegiate athletics in higher education -- to be a part of, rather than apart from, higher education and the key issues that affect college sports at any given time.

Clearly, more must be done. When I have discussed my concern about the lack of presidential understanding of intercollegiate athletics issues with the Division I Board of Directors, there has been general agreement. For example, the Board agrees that college presidents need to have a clear understanding of:

How athletics programs can and should support the educational mission.

The 16 principles governing intercollegiate athletics.

What "institutional control" means.

How national policy is created in all three divisions.

How the revenues generated by the NCAA are spent.

The conference role in governing college sports and how conferences relate to the NCAA.

The expectations for faculty involvement.

How the enforcement and infractions process works.

What the financial realities are for conducting intercollegiate athletics programs.

Where national or conference policy ends and local responsibility begins.

I propose an education model with components to address four important groups: (1) new college presidents; (2) existing college presidents; (3) advisors to college presidents; and (4) new members to the NCAA presidential bodies. See the accompanying list for details.

This is a modest beginning, and your feedback to the questions below would be especially helpful on this topic:

Is the President-to-President Web site an appropriate and sufficient communication method?

What other communications vehicles would help keep presidents up to date on the current issues facing intercollegiate athletics and higher education?

Would you prefer that educational programs be offered in conjunction with other higher education associations to which you may belong or solely through the NCAA?

Should other professional organizations be targeted?

Would you support an education model as described in the attachment?

No one appreciates more than I the tug of war college presidents feel on their time and attention. But, if we are to reconnect the athletics programs at NCAA member institutions to their academic missions (and keep them connected), then college presidents must find the will to act to commit to a program of continuing education.

Proposed Presidential Education Model

New college presidents

The NCAA would partner with the American Council on Education training for new college presidents to offer seminars on intercollegiate athletics, including these topics: sport ethics, current issues, governance of institutions and associations, influences of outside groups, fiscal integrity, philosophy of intercollegiate sport, and presidential control.

Existing college presidents

Educational efforts directed at existing college presidents would not necessarily take place in person. Other effective means of communication (for example, e-mail, the Internet) would be used to provide information on key issues in a timely fashion.

Advisors to college presidents

An educational partnership would be established between the NCAA and professional organizations to which various advisors for college presidents belong (for example, NASPA, NASULGC, NACUBO, NACUA). Targeted individuals would include provosts, business and finance officers, university attorneys, and student personnel administrators. In addition, the educational programs would be offered to the ACE Fellows.

New members of NCAA presidential bodies

A broad-based, comprehensive orientation session would be presented to presidents new to the NCAA governance structure. Upon completion of the orientation module, the presidents would be responsible for disseminating information regarding key NCAA issues to other presidents in their respective conferences. This "conference communication tree" would allow for president-to-president discussion on pressing issues facing intercollegiate athletics and higher education.

By the Numbers

The results of efforts to hire ethnic minorities of either gender in either head coaching or athletics director positions are dismal.

Number of black head coaches in all sports (13,780 positions available, including 6,819 in women's sports, historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) excluded: 737.

Number of minorities other than Blacks in athletics director positions in all divisions: 16.

Not only are women not making progress among head coaching ranks, they are losing ground over the last 30 years.

Number of women head coaches in all sports (15,454 positions available, including 7,461 in women's sports): 3,611.

Percentage of women in head coaching spots for women's teams in 1972 when Title IX was enacted: 90.

Percentage of women in head coaching spots for women's teams today: 45.6.

Percentage of women in head coaching spots for men's teams: Less than 2.

Divisions II and III are doing no better.

Number of Division II black head coaches (2,805 positions available, excluding HBCUs): 117.

Number of Division II women head coaches (3,195 positions available): 636.

Number of Division III black head coaches (6,310 positions available, excluding HBCUs): 204.

Number of Division III women head coaches (5,074 positions available): 1,423.


© 2010 The National Collegiate Athletic Association
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy