News and FeaturesAugust 5, 1996
Council to consider Convention proposals
The focus will be on proposed
legislation for the 1997 NCAA Convention
when the NCAA Council meets August 12-14
in Hot Springs, Virginia.
Primary attention will be devoted to the
final phase of restructuring
legislation, most of which will be
addressed on a division-by-division
basis.
At the 1996 Convention, delegates in all
three divisions approved the framework
for a restructured NCAA and left the
details until the 1997 event.
At this meeting, the Council and the
division steering committees will
propose legislation designed to fill in
those details. The principal emphasis
will involve establishment of a
committee substructure for the
Association and for each division.
The Transition Oversight Committee has
recommended 10 general committee
functions that it believes should be
designated as Association-wide in the
new structure. It also recommends that
sports committees with rules-making
responsibilities should span the
Association.
Beyond those functions, however, each
division will be on its own in
determining how it wants to address many
major issues, including such vital
matters as academic requirements and
financial aid.
The Division II transition team is
recommending a traditional approach,
proposing high-level administrative and
budget/finance committees, eight general
committees and committees for all sports
in which championships are conducted.
Division III has recommended something
similar, except it would have only seven
general committees.
The Division I transition team, however,
has recommended a "cabinet" approach, in
which most division-specific committee
functions will be dealt with through
four cabinets, each containing either 26
or 34 people, depending on the function.
Regardless of the approach, all of the
division substructures will have to be
determined through legislation, as will
the overall Association committee
structure.
Other Division II issues
One major topic in Division II that
relates indirectly to restructuring is
the enhancement of the institutional
self-study process for that division. At
the 1996 Convention, the Division II
membership decisively defeated an
athletics certification program, but it
was advised that general Association
funds still could be used to finance a
related initiative if it were approved
at the 1997 Convention. Since January,
Division II members of the NCAA
Presidents Commission have concluded
that the best approach for the division
is to strengthen the Institutional
Self-Study Guide, rather than
implementing a certification plan.
The presidents also are recommending
greater emphasis on Division II
rules-compliance efforts, which would
be paid for from the funds that were going
to be used to finance Division II
certification. In the new approach,
expenses could involve additional
staffing or travel for compliance
reviews and seminars. However, the
financial outlay would be substantially
smaller than an athletics certification
program would have been.
Committee reports
Major issues for discussion for the full
Council include reports from the June
meeting of the Presidents Commission,
the Transition Oversight Committee, the
Committee on Competitive Safeguards and
Medical Aspects of Sports, and the
Special Committee on Agents and
Amateurism (see story, page 1).
Other reports will be provided by the
NCAA Special Events, Recruiting,
Professional Sports Liaison, Olympic
Sports Liaison, National Youth Sports
Program, Minority Opportunities and
Interests, Legislative Review,
Eligibility, Communications and Academic
Requirements Committees; the Committees
on Women's Athletics and Infractions;
the Special Committee to Oversee Implementation of NCAA the
Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse; and
the Administrative Review Panel.
Besides restructuring issues and
division-specific legislative proposals,
the Division I Steering Committee will
review recommendations from the NCAA
Committee on Athletics Certification,
including that committee's proposal for
including sportsmanship and ethical
conduct as a component in the
certification program.
The Division III Steering Committee will
receive reports from the three
subcommittees of the Division III Task
Force to Review the NCAA Membership
Structure: membership, governance and
championships.
Highlights of the Council's August
meeting will be reported in the
September 2 issue of The NCAA News.
|